Apreciados compañeros. Alumnos. Publico en General. Esta pagina la he creado para que comentemos en Español e Ingles todo lo relacionado a contenido academico, economico, filosofico, cultural, asi como lo concerniente a sus necesidades de traduccion por interprete Publico en idioma Ingles. ¡Exito!.
January is to a new year what the morning is to a new day. 2017 can be a time to reset your professional activities or strengthen what you’re already doing well. Some professionals witnessed amazing results in 2016. Maybe you’re one of them. Take advantage of the wave an head winds as you press ahead in 2017. ¿ What are your plans for the future? Anser this question according to the description above.
ResponderEliminarEl término inaugurar aparece en Deuteronomio XX, 5 dentro del contexto de construcción: "מִי הָאִישׁ אֲשֶׁר בָּנָה בַיִת חָדָשׁ וְלֹא חֲנָכוֹ”, “si alguno construyó una casa nueva y no la inauguró…”. También en Salmos XXX, 1 reza: "מִזְמוֹר שִׁיר חֲנֻכַּת הַבַּיִת לְדָוִד", “Cántico para la inauguración del Templo”. Por lo tanto, la raíz hebrea que se está utilizando para representar la inauguración es .ח.נ.כ. Sorprendentemente, esta es la misma raíz que representa el significado de educación.
ResponderEliminarEl verdadero significado de educación ¿Qué relación hay entre inauguración y educación? Proverbios 22,6 expone:“חֲנֹךְ לַנַּעַר עַל פִּי דַרְכּוֹ”, “Instruye al niño en su camino”. Lo que observamos aquí es una bella metáfora de la lengua hebrea. Cada niño se asemeja a una nueva casa que está por ser inaugurada. Dado que el educador no deja jamás de enseñar, esta acción es continua y permanente. En tanto que aprende, un niño es inaugurado constantemente en la educación. Es sumamente beneficioso que el niño desde su tierna edad comience a practicar un segundo idioma ademas del nativo. Le abriras las puertas del mundo. Actualmente Ingles es el idioma comercial, en todos los paises se defendera. Aqui le instruimos.
Give freely and spontaneously. Don’t have a stingy heart. The way you handle matters like this triggers GOD, your God’s, blessing in everything you do, all your work and ventures. — Deuteronomy 15:10
ResponderEliminarGive generously to them and do so without a grudging heart; then because of this the Lord your God will bless you in all your work and in everything you put your hand to. — Deuteronomy 15:10 NIV
Psychology has helped us understand that even a subtle gesture or the tone of someone’s voice can trigger a memory or a reaction. Some memories are good, such as times with a loved one, an especially fun vacation, or a time when God’s presence was very real.
EliminarSometimes, though, painful memories or feelings of anger can be triggered. At times those triggers blindside us. Suddenly we’re dealing with intense emotions we didn’t anticipate.
Today’s verse [Deuteronomy 15:10] says that God has triggers and gives us a specific example.
How we treat people — whether we lead generous, giving lives or cold, stingy lives — triggers God.
When His children give spontaneously without regard for the cost, He is triggered to bless them. He will give peace to those of us who freely give to others in all we do.
Are you living in a way that triggers God’s blessings?
Prayer
God, enable me to me to live openly and give generously, not for Your blessing but to honor You with my life. Amen.
Many times in my life, I return to the promise in Jeremiah 29:11:
ResponderEliminar‘I know the plans I have for you,’ declares the Lord, ‘plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.’ This had been my favorite verse for some time. It helped me when deciding which college to attend, what path to take, which way to turn in so many of life’s decisions.
I still have a picture frame with this verse engraved on it from my high school graduation. It’s a verse many of us love, because it is a promise that God is good and wants to be good toward us.But as my life plans were not working out as I had envisioned, I found less and less comfort in these words. Some days, this verse even seemed like a joke. It’s easy to believe that God has a good plan for your life when things are working out well, but it’s a little tougher when the path is difficult.
ResponderEliminarAnd my path has been difficult. Uprooting my life and moving so many times to start over, to get away from my broken past. Company layoffs and job loss. The sudden death of friends. Years of being stalked and anxiety over my safety. I’ve gone through times when it seemed as if God’s plans were not prospering me at all; in fact, it felt like they were hurting me.I became confused because I couldn’t see any divine “plan” for my life, much less that it was good. In fact, there were times when I thought God was taunting me. What is He trying to do? I thought. Make me tough? Make me stronger? How were His plans bringing me hope? I had yet to see this prosperity He promised. I began hating this verse, especially when it was read aloud in church or quoted at the local Christian bookstore. I really was not liking God’s “plans”!fe falls in pieces.
ResponderEliminarLet me know which are your expectations from this blob traductormuller@gmail.com
ResponderEliminarla Reforma del Fin del Mundo propuesta de enmienda constitucional que aprobó el senado de Brasil el mes pasado. Debido a que segun la reforma congelarán todo el gasto federal durante 20 años, incluyendo la educación y los servicios de salud.
ResponderEliminarEl gobierno lo justificó pues Brasil enfrenta importantes déficits presupuestarios.Como es habitual tomaron la calle y se toparon con gas lacrimógeno y oficiales de la policía montada. Los estudiantes de secundaria tomaron mil escuelas en protesta.l gobierno no dará marcha atrás. La Reforma del Fin del Mundo es solo una de las muchas medidas neoliberales En agosto del año pasado, la presidenta Dilma Rousseff, del Partido de los Trabajadores, fue destituida del cargo al ser acusada de haber manipulado el presupuesto estatal. Tan pronto como Temer, quien era vicepresidente de Rousseff, asumió el cargo, anunció una serie de políticas neoliberales. Su reforma al presupuesto dañará a los ciudadanos más pobres y vulnerables del país durante las próximas décadas. Un impoacto negativo para para la pobreza extrema y los derechos humanos, “congelará gastos en niveles inadecuados y rápidamente decrecientes en salud, educación y seguridad social, dejando, por tanto, a toda una generación futura en riesgo de recibir una protección social muy por debajo de los niveles actuales”. Además de congelar el gasto, establecerá la edad mínima para el retiro a los 65 años, en un país en el que una persona promedio se retira a los 54. La ley también exige al menos 25 años de aportaciones al sistema de seguridad social para hombres y mujeres. Brasil es uno de los países con mayor desigualdad en el mundo. Poco después de aprobar el techo del presupuesto, el gobierno propuso un plan laboral que permitiría convenios entre los empleados y los sindicatos que se impondrían sobre las leyes laborales. La nueva propuesta también aumenta el máximo de horas laborales permitidas a 12 al día y reduce la reglamentación en materia de empleo de trabajadores provisionales. La comunidad empresarial ha alabado el plan, pero desató indignación entre los sindicatos. No obstante, el nuevo gobierno ya ha recibido todo el apoyo de las siguientes organizaciones: la Federación Brasileña de Bancos, el Frente Parlamentario Agrícola, la Confederación Nacional de Industria, la Organización Mundial del Comercio, la Federación de Industrias del Estado de São Paulo, la Federación de Industrias del Estado de Río de Janeiro, la Cámara Brasileña de la Industria de la Construcción, la Federación Nacional de Distribuidores de Vehículos Automotores y varios altos ejecutivos. Para algunos brasileños, al menos, el fin del mundo es el comienzo de una oportunidad de oro.
Propaganda Politica. En Mein Kampf, Hitler argumentaba que la propaganda efectiva apela a “los sentimientos de la audiencia más que a su capacidad de razonamiento”; se basa en “formulas estereotipadas” que se repiten una y otra vez para meterles esas ideas en la cabeza a las masas, y usa fórmulas sencillas de “amor u odio, bien o mal” para atacar al enemigo, mientras se hace referencia a argumentos “unilaterales e intencionalmente sesgados”.
ResponderEliminarAunque por lo general la propaganda se ha asociado con regímenes totalitarios como la Alemania Nazi y la Unión Soviética, el académico Jason Stanley, profesor de filosofía en la Universidad de Yale, nos recuerda en su último libro que la propaganda también puede ser un verdadero peligro para las democracias. El tema no podía ser más relevante en la actualidad, dada la proliferación de noticias falsas y la desinformación en la red, la existencia de un público con un apetito voraz de escándalo y entretenimiento, los medios de comunicación obsesionados con los ratings y los clics, los rusos inmiscuidos en la campaña presidencial estadounidense de 2016 y un presidente electo que ha avivado los temores y el resentimiento de quienes lo apoyan y que, además, cambia repentinamente de opinión y siembra confusión con sus tuits.
En la reciente edición de bolsillo de How Propaganda Works, Stanley analiza la propaganda moderna: su operación, técnicas y efectos colaterales. Su prosa puede caer en un tono académico molesto, pero el lector que pueda superar las repeticiones y el argot descubrirá que este libro proporciona reflexiones valiosas sobre un tema importante y oportuno.Stanley comienza por darnos una definición de propaganda que va más allá de las descripciones del diccionario que dicen que es información sesgada o engañosa que se usa para promover una causa política o un punto de vista. El autor nos dice que la propaganda es una parte característica del mecanismo mediante el cual se engaña a la gente respecto de cómo puede hacer realidad sus metas y en consecuencia se le impide ver qué es lo mejor. Esto se logra a través de medios probados con el tiempo, al apelar a las emociones de tal forma que el debate racional se haga de lado o haga cortocircuito; al promocionar una dinámica de nuestra gente/intrusos que contamine la conversación más amplia con estereotipos negativos de grupos minoritarios y al erosionar las normas comunitarias de “lo razonable” para profundizar en “normas de respeto mutuo y responsabilidad mutua”.
If you die tonight “So, how about you? If you died tonight where will you go? Remember, to get to Heaven you need a perfect record which you could never have unless you ask Jesus to give you His. To receive this free gift you only have to do two things. First, be willing to turn away from the wrong in your life; and secondly, surrender to Jesus.
ResponderEliminarUnless you do these two things, it’s impossible to be forgiven and in death it’s impossible to get into Heaven. Which is so sad, because this is the very reason Jesus died for you.” Ask Jesus for Forgiveness God knows your thoughts and motives. He desires you to come to Him, thanking Him for Jesus’ death for you on the cross. You receive Jesus Christ into your life by personally asking Him to come into your life and forgive your sins. He wants to be your Lord and Savior.If you haven’t ever invited Jesus into your life, simply pray the following words. But remember, it’s not the words you say but the attitude of your heart that is important. “Dear Lord Jesus, thank you for dying for all my sins—past, present, and future. Thank you for giving me eternal life, which you made possible by your death and resurrection. I receive you as my Savior by faith, and desire you to be Lord of my life.” When you ask Jesus Christ into your life, you begin a life with Him here on earth that will extend into all eternity. There are blessings for you to experience now as well as in heaven!
El Equitativismo una Teoría alternativa al Keynesianismo y al Monetarismo Consideraciones Preliminares: La humanidad ha tenido necesidad de entender y gobernar los fenómenos relacionados con las actividades propias de la economía, cuyo objeto como ciencia social, es estudiar la forma de organizar la sociedad, para generar los servicios y bienes económicos que son escasos, considerando los procesos de: producción, distribución, comercialización y consumo, que satisfagan las necesidades del ser humano de forma sostenible en el tiempo.Sin embargo, la historia nos ha enseñado que la economía, vista como un conjunto de actividades humanas, se comporta de manera cíclica y es rebelde e impredecible, pasando por períodos de expansión y depresión, que han generado sufrimiento a los ciudadanos y en algunos casos guerras en diversas naciones y en diferentes épocas, cuando todo falla.
ResponderEliminarA pesar de haber existido muchas mentes brillantes que han dedicado gran cantidad tiempo y esfuerzo tratando de entender las leyes que rigen a la economía y cómo predecir su comportamiento futuro, todavía hoy las naciones no han podido lograr que los ciclos económicos sean suaves y no terminen con colapsos catastróficos y lentas recuperaciones.Para estabilizar y recuperar las economías colapsadas, hay que revertir las políticas económicas, que produjeron dichos colapsos. Esas políticas se basan actualmente, en la aplicación de dos teorías predominantes confrontadas entre sí y que aunque contengan muchas verdades relativas, en la práctica han demostrado que son incompletas y fracasan en el mediano y el largo plazo.
A continuación se expone un breve resumen de las dos teorías predominantes en la actualidad, que son muy respetables, pero ineficaces:El Keynesianismo:
Esta teoría sugiere la fuerte intervención del Estado para aplicar políticas fiscales y monetarias, en el control de indicadores macroeconómicos tales como son: la tasa de inflación, la tasa de desempleo y la tasa de crecimiento del PIB, manejando las variables que componen la Demanda Agregada (DA), función que se puede expresar mediante la fórmula siguiente:
DA = C + I + G + X
Dónde:
C = Consumo de los hogares.
I = Inversión de las empresas.
G = Gasto del gobierno.
X = Exportaciones netas.
De acuerdo a esta teoría, si se desea aumentar el PIB y por ende expandir la Oferta Agregada, se debe incrementar la Demanda Agregada, mediante la aplicación de políticas fiscales como son: disminución de los impuestos para que las familias dispongan de más dinero y crezca el Consumo y por otra parte aumentando el Gasto del gobierno.
Desde el punto de vista monetario, hay que disminuir la tasa de interés para que haya más Inversión del sector privado y aumentar la Liquidez monetaria, para que el gobierno pueda financiar el Gasto público.
Por otra parte, desde el punto de vista cambiario, sugiere devaluar la moneda para favorecer las exportaciones.Según la teoría keynesiana, la aplicación de estas medidas en el sentido indicado anteriormente, también genera incremento de la tasa de inflación y disminución de la tasa de desempleo (curva de Phillips o relación inversa entre inflación y desempleo).Por tanto, para disminuir la tasa de inflación habría que cambiar el sentido de las políticas fiscales y monetarias que hicieron crecer ese indicador, mediante la contracción de la Demanda Agregada, es decir, se debería: aumentar los impuestos para reducir el Consumo, aumentar las tasas de interés para contraer la Inversión, disminuir el Gasto público y revaluar la moneda.
President-elect Donald Trump’s recent public rebuff on social media of his own party’s secretive actions to gut the Congressional ethics board was a breath of fresh air. But that is not the only issue he should push back on with Congressional Republicans.
ResponderEliminarUnder a Republican budget resolution, the national debt will explode by a third from an already staggering $19 billion to $29 trillion over the next ten years. Although counterintuitive, Democratic presidents, at least those after World War II, have reduced deficits as a portion of the value of the national economy (GDP) while Republican presidents have increased them—thus accumulating less public debt as a percentage of GDP. Yet neither political party has paid enough attention to this burgeoning national security problem.
National security problem? Yes. General Mike Mullen, while he was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the nation’s top military man, was enlightened enough about long-term health of American power to realize that it takes continuing infusions of money to acquire the weapons and equipment, personnel, training, maintenance and benefits to create a credible military to adequately defend the country. In addition, all other indices of national power—political, diplomatic and cultural—require money too.
To generate those resources, a strong economy is needed. The number one problem dragging down economic growth rates through the George W. Bush and Barack Obama presidencies was a crippling national debt. In turn, even slight differences in economic growth rates over time among great powers can shake up the pecking order among them. With the Chinese economy’s double-digit growth rates in recent years, that is an ominous sign for the long-term international standing and power of the United States.
Politicians, especially Republican ones, love to win votes by cutting taxes while conveniently forgetting all their rhetoric about cutting spending. The American people like government but don’t really want to pay for it. (Considering post-World War II presidents, Democrats cut taxes as a portion of GDP slightly less than Republicans did, but surprisingly restrained spending much more as a percentage of GDP, leading them to generate lower deficits and less debt as a portion of GDP than their Republican counterparts.) Considering the budget resolution, Congressional Republicans may again go down the same path as Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, cutting taxes but increasing government spending, thereby widening budget deficits and ballooning the national debt.
Predictably, despite perennial talk of badly needed reform of entitlements like Medicare and Social Security, politicians from all parties are usually afraid to reform these programs, often due to their popularity and powerful constituencies. Yet, as the Baby Boomer generation retires, these programs are teetering on the edge of insolvency. In addition, Republicans are talking about increased infrastructure and defense spending (despite the fact that the United States, with excellent intrinsic security, already shells out on defense what the next seven highest spending nations combined do).
Some hope exists, however, that President-elect Trump is concerned about government spending, even in the security sector. Using Twitter as the main weapon in his public arsenal, he has roiled traditionally Republican constituencies by criticizing the costly F-35 fighter program and Boeing’s extravagant modification of Air Force One. But President-elect Trump should also take a wider look at the unnecessary and costly U.S. role as the world’s policemen, which he criticized during his campaign. Trillions could be saved by providing for the common defense, which is all the Constitution authorizes—not military operations around the globe to wage offensive war, export democracy, keep the peace, or even ensure stability. Sticking to the nation’s founders’ notion of a non-militaristic republic would both save money and help renew U.S. economic power, making America great again for the foreseeable future and beyond.
If you had set out to assess Barack Obama’s legacy four years ago, when he won re-election convincingly over Mitt Romney, the assessment might have gone like this. On foreign policy, reasonably high marks: Osama bin Laden dead, disengagement from Iraq without disaster, no major wars or catastrophic blunders.
ResponderEliminarENEVA — U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said on Wednesday he is determined to reform the world body and to see a diplomatic "surge" to overcome obstacles in peace talks.
ResponderEliminarGuterres said the United Nations was irreplaceable and its actions had reduced suffering. "But I’m also aware of the shortcomings and the failures of the U.N.," he told reporters.
"That’s why I’m totally committed first of all to a surge in diplomacy for peace, to make the U.N. more effective in trying to address the dramatic multiplication of conflicts that we are witnessing and to put full priority on the prevention of those conflicts."
Under Guterres' predecessor Ban Ki-moon, the U.N. tried and has so far failed to make peace between warring sides in Syria, Yemen and Libya, while wars in Ukraine, South Sudan, Nigeria and elsewhere have continued unabated.
An early test for Guterres will be U.N.-led talks to reunify Cyprus, a decades-old conflict that has pushed Greece and Turkey to the brink of war in the past.
Officials from both sides of the divided island, as well as Greece, Turkey and Britain, opened a round of technical talks at a secluded Swiss resort on Wednesday to try to pave the way for a potential deal at talks in Geneva later this month.
In the previous round of Cyprus talks, U.N. envoy Espen Barth Eide said Guterres had been very active and involved almost daily in negotiations."It will send a very strong signal to a conflicted world and a region in which we see many wars and many things breaking apart, if we could find one place where things just came together," Eide said.
Eide cited U.N. Syria envoy Staffan de Mistura, who is planning a new round of Syria peace talks in February, as saying that a sign of progress on Cyprus could help other peace processes around the world.
Guterres said he also wanted to simplify and decentralize U.N. management and make it more effective, accountable and flexible.
He also pledged to "engage constructively" with the new U.S. administration, and cited Donald Trump's view that there was a lot of potential in the United Nations.
"That is exactly what I think, and we need to work to reform the U.N. in order to make sure that potential is fully met," Guterres said.
“Coastlands, listen to Me in silence,
ResponderEliminarAnd let the peoples gain new strength;
Let them come forward, then let them speak;
Let us come together for judgment.
2 “Who has aroused one from the east
Whom He calls in righteousness to His [a]feet?
He delivers up nations before him
And subdues kings.
He makes them like dust with his sword,
As the wind-driven chaff with his bow.
3 “He pursues them, passing on in safety,
By a way he had not been [b]traversing with his feet.
4 “Who has performed and accomplished it,
Calling forth the generations from the beginning?
‘I, the Lord, am the first, and with the last. I am He.’”
5 The coastlands have seen and are afraid;
The ends of the earth tremble;
They have drawn near and have come.
6 Each one helps his neighbor
And says to his brother, “Be strong!”
7 So the craftsman encourages the smelter,
And he who smooths metal with the hammer encourages him who beats the anvil,
Saying of the soldering, “It is good”;
And he fastens it with nails,
So that it will not totter.
8 “But you, Israel, My servant,
Jacob whom I have chosen,
Descendant of Abraham My friend,
9 You whom I have [c]taken from the ends of the earth,
And called from its remotest parts
And said to you, ‘You are My servant,
I have chosen you and not rejected you.
10 ‘Do not fear, for I am with you;
Do not anxiously look about you, for I am your God.
I will strengthen you, surely I will help you,
Surely I will uphold you with My righteous right hand.’
11 “Behold, all those who are angered at you will be shamed and dishonored;
Those who contend with you will be as nothing and will perish.
12 “You will seek those who quarrel with you, but will not find them,
Those who war with you will be as nothing and non-existent.
13 “For I am the Lord your God, who upholds your right hand,
Who says to you, ‘Do not fear, I will help you.’
14 “Do not fear, you worm Jacob, you men of Israel;
I will help you,” declares the Lord, “[d]and your Redeemer is the Holy One of Israel.
15 “Behold, I have made you a new, sharp threshing sledge with double edges;
You will thresh the mountains and pulverize them,
And will make the hills like chaff.
16 “You will winnow them, and the wind will carry them away,
And the storm will scatter them;
But you will rejoice in the Lord,
You will glory in the Holy One of Israel.